Moderators: thessarabian, pstrmry, TravisW

thessarabian wrote:This one came from wikipedia. The Baptist listing is odd, I'm not sure why the dotted line is there. My understanding was that Baptists "reformed" what Calvin put out there, but came out of his sect- so it seems that they should be a split off the Reformed Church. Oh well, it's all interesting to look at.


thessarabian wrote:From what I read on that link, only one section of Baptists came from Calvinists, another group came from another tradition, and so on. It seems to be a very catch-all label. So in a way I think we are both right, since there's such a huge variety that both of us can be right and wrong at the same time (if that makes any sense). I know Baptists who disavow Pentacostals and insist that they "aren't Christian", and say about the same thing about a lot of nondenoms. But since the label Baptist has been used with such varied theology it's hard to pin down what is or is not "Baptist".

oldlutheran wrote:You can pre-order your 2008 Old Lutheran Stein starting today.
Order your stein Here.









ValS wrote:It's only funny if both sides get a fair and balanced slam. Not all your customers are Obamaniacs.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests